theincontinencestore

For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, akropolistravel.com and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI -book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to expand his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI -generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.