Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
By Natalie Sherman
Business press reporter, New york city
A restriction on sports betting wagering in a lot of US states might be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that largely banned sports betting gaming, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" concern.
The case, which started on Monday, comes after New Jersey locals voted in 2011 to legalise sports betting wagering.
A group of sports betting leagues on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.
Lower courts have regularly ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy alternatives.
The Supreme Court opted to hear the case however amid a broader shift in American attitudes toward gaming.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.
bet9ja.com
But in the last few years, states starving for tax revenue in the wake of the monetary crash have actually enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, gathering large levies on gaming revenue.
There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments - roughly double the number a years earlier.
Despite the official restriction, which already excuses Nevada and 3 other states, illegal sports betting wagering is swarming in the US.
Americans put about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It says the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is commonplace.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of crucial tax income and allow them to enjoy the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman stated.
More than 15 states filed documents in support of New Jersey in the case. A handful have actually currently passed laws to authorise sports betting wagering in case of a change.
'Times have actually altered'
On Monday, as attorneys started arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
bit.ly
The court is expected to make a choice in June 2018.
bet9ja.com
"If we are successful here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a choice by the court," said outgoing New Jersey governor Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're all set to go."
Regardless of the court's final judgment, Congress may also take up the argument amidst wider discussion about online gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the professional sports betting leagues have started to alter their positions on the concern of gaming.
bet9ja.com
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would develop an uniform set of rules across the US. "Times have actually altered," he composed in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts fighting with mobile sports betting
3 October 2017
The tricky issue of issue sports betting
31 August 2017
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the United States Sports Betting Ban?
tessavonwiller edited this page 2025-01-02 00:05:16 +00:00